Announcements
-
HES, Vol. 16, No. 4, December 2026: Call for Papers
Posted on Aug 3, 2026 Higher Education Studies (HES) is calling for papers for the Vol. 16, No. 4, December 2026 issue (Deadline: October 10, 2026). Read More
-
ERIC Metrics Report Generated for: Higher Education Studies
Posted on May 5, 2023 This report shows the number of views of the ERIC records for your content and the number of PDF downloads if you permit the full text to display in ERIC. These statistics are for the six-month... Read More
Current: Vol. 16, No. 4 (2026)
-
- The Hierarchical Cultivation Path of AI Literacy for Aviation Equipment Instructors under the SAMR Framework
-
- Ting Wang
- Kexin Ma
- Fuqing Zhang
- p1
PDF
- Enhancing Pre-service Teachers’ Scientific Inquiry Questioning through Generative AI-Supported Scaffolding
-
- Pawinee Rattanakorn
- Jadsada Ratniyom
- Pattamaporn Kaewkhongkha
- p8
PDF
- Factors Influencing Vocational Students' Acceptance of Generative AI for Learning: A PLS-SEM Approach
-
- Ponpot Chooppawa
- Potsirin Limpinan
- Thada Jantakoon
- p21
PDF
- Transformational Leadership, Work Environment and Internal Marketing Enhance Organizational Effectiveness
-
- Zexiang Hu
- Khunanan Sukpasjaroen
- Aroonroj Boonkrong
- p30
PDF
- The Development of Digital Innovative Learning Media Based on the Professional Learning Community (PLC) Process for Participatory Learning
-
- Vanida Kejornrak
- Paramin Nuan-in
- Jinawatara Pakotang
- Rakpong Boonsiri
- p77
PDF
- Enhancing Knowledge, Attitudes and Practical Skills of the International Standards System for the Environmental Management (ISO14001: 2015)
-
- Anurak Luesopha
- Prayoon Wongchantra
- Likhit Junkaew
- Kannika Sookngam
- p87
PDF
- Comfort versus Legitimacy? Student Perspectives on In-Course, Online, and AI-Mediated Assessment
-
- Oleg Kirsanov
- Lovleen Kushwah
- Geethanjali Selvaretnam
- p102
PDF
- A Program to Strengthen Servant Leadership of University Library Department Heads in Nanning
-
- Xiaoying Lin
- Chaiyon Paophan
- Pattarawan Kamplae
- p116
PDF
- Understanding Technology Acceptance in Virtual Electrical and Electronics Laboratories: Evidence from Chinese Higher Vocational Students
-
- Tong Yan
- Thada Jantakoon
- Rukthin Laoha
- p128
PDF
- Predicting Teachers' Behavioral Intention to Adopt Generative AI in Teaching: An Integrated TAM-UTAUT Regression Model
-
- Xu Chengjun
- Thada Jantakoon
- Rukthin Laoha
- p146
PDF
- Industrial Engineering Students’ Acceptance of PLC Learning: A PLS-SEM Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model
-
- Xiaohai Liu
- Thada Jantakoon
- Rukthin Laoha
- p165
PDF
- Who Offloads and Who Co-Creates? Comparing Undergraduate and MBA Learners in Agent-Driven Business English Project-Based Learning
-
- Jing Shi
- Chuqi Wu
- Yuting Zhang
- p185
PDF
Journal Publishing Workflow
Please see the workflow for the article publication:

Paper Selection and Publication Process
a) Submission acknowledgement and initial screening. The journal normally acknowledges receipt of a submission within one to three working days. The editorial office conducts an initial assessment of the manuscript’s completeness, relevance to the journal’s aims and scope, originality, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and conformity with essential submission requirements. A manuscript may be returned to the authors or rejected without external review when it clearly does not meet these requirements. If another CCSE journal appears more appropriate, the editorial office may offer the authors an optional manuscript transfer. No manuscript or associated submission information will be transferred without the authors’ consent.
b) External peer review. Manuscripts that pass initial editorial screening are normally evaluated through double-anonymized peer review by at least two independent external reviewers with relevant expertise. Editorial screening is not counted as external peer review. Although the journal takes reasonable steps to protect anonymity, complete anonymity cannot be guaranteed because author identity may be inferred from preprints, citations, datasets, conference presentations, or the subject matter. The review process normally takes approximately four to ten weeks but may vary according to reviewer availability, manuscript complexity, revision requirements, and ethical or technical checks.
c) Editorial decision. Reviewer recommendations are advisory. The editor makes the editorial decision after considering the reviewers’ reports, the manuscript’s scholarly quality, relevance, originality, methodological or analytical validity, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and any other relevant information. Possible decisions include acceptance, minor revision, major revision, rejection with an invitation to submit a substantially revised manuscript as a new submission, or rejection.
d) Revision and acceptance. When revision is requested, authors must submit a revised manuscript together with a point-by-point response explaining how each comment has been addressed or why a suggested change was not made. A request for revision does not guarantee acceptance. Article processing charges are requested only after final acceptance, in accordance with the fee information published on the journal website.
e) Publication and access. Following acceptance, production, approval of the page proofs by the corresponding author, and completion of any applicable administrative requirements, the article is published online as the version of record. Published articles are made freely and immediately available under the open-access license stated in the article.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Index
Contact
- Sherry LinEditorial Assistant
- hes@ccsenet.org



