Making People Redundant


  •  Adrian Furnham    
  •  George Horne    

Abstract

This paper looked at the correlates of individual’s recommendations for making people redundant.  Participants ranked the importance of various criteria (length of service, attendance, disciplinary/performance records) used to make job redundancies. They were also asked to add any additional criteria, and their many suggestions included individual circumstances, organisational costs, and employee engagement. The focus was on individual difference correlates of rating 10 criteria to make redundancy decisions. In all, 499 working British adults completed various questionnaires, including Just World Beliefs, Organisational Disenchantment and Equity at work. There was considerable agreement on redundancy criteria, with the three most important being performance records, skills and competencies, and disciplinary records. The variable that most correlated with the chosen redundancy criteria was education. Regressions indicated that different individual difference variables were related to different redundancy criteria preferences. Limitations are acknowledged, and implications considered.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • ISSN(Print): 1833-3850
  • ISSN(Online): 1833-8119
  • Started: 2006
  • Frequency: bimonthly

Journal Metrics

Google Scholar Citations

h-index: 174

i10-index: 1295

WoS Reviewer Recognition

Clarivate - Web of Science

IJBM partners with Web of Science to recognize our reviewers' contributions. You can forward your review thank-you email to reviews@webofscience.com to automatically log your certified credits on your Web of Science Researcher Profile.

Contact