Case Study: Helping Corporate Board Members Stay Diligent (Post Enron)
- Renee Pistone
Abstract
The Enron financial scandal impacted Wall Street and Board rooms within multinational corporations. Board Members need guidance in order to prevent fraud and abuse. The attorney featured in the following hypothetical faces serious ethical dilemmas. This hypothetical is unique because it involves an attorney Board Member facing ethical problems within a large business organization, as opposed to a one-on-one attorney-client situation. Here, the attorney Board Member, has a significant financial stake in the outcome. Certain issues will be delved into and analyzed according to customarily accepted Ethical standards for Board Members. Later on, this article is supplemented by federal and state case law. Supplemental cases were specifically chosen to emphasize and relay certain key principles of black letter law. Also, this article offers Board Members some reasonable alternatives to follow in order to follow due diligence.- Full Text:
PDF
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v5n5p51
Journal Metrics
Google Scholar-Based Metrics (2026)
- h-index: 174
- i10-index: 1316
Source: Google Scholar profile, retrieved 2026-10-07
Index
- ACNP
- AIDEA list (Italian Academy of Business Administration)
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- CNKI Scholar
- CrossRef
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- iDiscover
- Library and Archives Canada(LAC)
- MIAR
- National Library of Australia
- Qualis/CAPES
- RePEc
- ROAD
- Scilit
- WorldCat
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
Contact
- Stephen LeeEditorial Assistant
- ijbm@ccsenet.org