Mainstreaming Metrology Activities for Enhanced Consumer Protection: Mapping Enforcement Challenges within Tanzania’s Quality Infrastructure System
- Laurent A. Kabikiye
Abstract
This study examines the mainstreaming of metrology as a means of strengthening consumer protection in Tanzania, with particular emphasis on enforcement challenges within the national quality infrastructure system. Guided by international standards and best practices advanced by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), the International Organisation of Legal Metrology (OIML), particularly OIML D.1:2020 (E), and the East African Community Standardisation, Quality Assurance, Metrology and Testing Act, 2006, the study adopts a qualitative research approach to evaluate Tanzania's legal and institutional framework. The findings suggest that, although the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) and the Weights and Measures Agency (WMA) are the principal institutions responsible for standardisation and legal metrology, enforcement is constrained by overlapping statutory mandates and fragmented institutional coordination. Both institutions perform inspection, certification, and aspects of conformity assessment, resulting in regulatory duplication, operational inefficiencies, increased compliance costs, and uncertainty among market participants. These institutional overlaps are inconsistent with internationally recognised principles that require clearly defined institutional responsibilities and coordinated quality infrastructure governance. The study further suggests that limited technical capacity, inadequate inter-agency collaboration, and weak market surveillance undermine regulatory enforcement and reduce the effectiveness of consumer protection measures. The study recommends the adoption of a comprehensive National Quality Policy to clarify institutional mandates, eliminate overlapping functions, strengthen coordination among quality infrastructure institutions, and promote integrated market surveillance and information sharing. The study also advocates capacity building and closer alignment with regional and international metrology standards and best practices to improve regulatory efficiency, measurement accuracy, consumer confidence, fair trade, and sustainable consumer protection in Tanzania.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v21n4p253
Journal Metrics
IJBM's citation performance is tracked through publicly available scholarly metrics. According to Google Scholar Citations (latest available snapshot):
- h-index: 176
- i10-index: 1322
These metrics reflect citations indexed by Google Scholar and are provided for transparency. The journal is not currently indexed in Web of Science or Scopus.
Index
- ACNP
- AIDEA list (Italian Academy of Business Administration)
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- CNKI Scholar
- EBSCOhost
- EconPapers
- Electronic Journals Library
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- IBZ Online
- IDEAS
- iDiscover
- JournalTOCs
- Library and Archives Canada
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- National Library of Australia
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- RePEc
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- WorldCat
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
Contact
- Stephen LeeEditorial Assistant
- ijbm@ccsenet.org