Exploring Correlates of Business Undergraduates’ Closed Versus Open Grading Assessment Learning Perceptions
- Gary Blau
- Misty Blessley
- Matthew Kunkle
- Michael Schirmer
- Howard Keen
Abstract
Motivated by a lack of scales for measuring business undergraduates’ grading assessment learning perceptions (GALP), this research created two three-item GALP scales, closed and open. Two separate samples of senior business undergraduates (fall, 2015, n = 220 and spring, 2016, n = 690) were used. Closed GALP and open GALP were identified via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Subsequent stepwise regression analyses consistently showed that satisfaction/reputation had a positive impact and accounted for the most variance in these two GALP scales across both samples. Research limitations and future research issues are discussed.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/jedp.v7n1p229
Journal Metrics
(The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations)
1. Google-based Impact Factor (2021): 1.11
2. h-index (December 2021): 29
3. i10-index (December 2021): 87
4. h5-index (December 2021): N/A
5. h5-median (December 2021): N/A
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- CNKI Scholar
- Copyright Clearance Center
- CrossRef
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Harvard Library
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalSeek
- JournalTOCs
- LIVIVO (ZB MED)
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- Open Access Journals Search Engine(OAJSE)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- UCR Library
- UoB Library
- WorldCat
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Carol WongEditorial Assistant
- jedp@ccsenet.org