A Contrastive Study of Hedges in COVID-19 Reports Selected from China Daily and The New York Times
- Wang Ya’nan
- Tian Zhiling
- Wang Jinghua
Abstract
Based on Jef Verschueren’s Adaptation Theory, Lakoff’s definition and Prince et al.’s classification of hedges, this paper takes New York Times and China Daily from January 23rd to April 8th, 2020 as corpus sources, randomly selects 39 COVID-19 reports, and makes a contrastive study of hedges among them, aiming at exploring the similarities and differences in the use of hedges in COVID-19 reports selected from Chinese and American mainstream newspapers and further revealing their influencing factors.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ies.v16n1p42
Journal Metrics
h-index : 62
i10-index: 604
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- AcademicKeys
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- DESY Publication Database
- DTU Library
- Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Ghent University Library
- Harvard Library
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalTOCs
- Library and Archives Canada (LAC)
- LOCKSS
- LSE Library
- MIAR
- Microsoft Academic
- Mir@bel
- NewJour
- OAJI
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Polska Bibliografia Naukowa
- Qualis/CAPES
- ROAD
- Scilit
- Southwest-German Union Catalogue
- Stanford Libraries
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- USask Library
- VOCEDplus
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- ies@ccsenet.org