A Contrastive Study of Hedges in COVID-19 Reports Selected from China Daily and The New York Times
- Wang Ya’nan
- Tian Zhiling
- Wang Jinghua
Abstract
Based on Jef Verschueren’s Adaptation Theory, Lakoff’s definition and Prince et al.’s classification of hedges, this paper takes New York Times and China Daily from January 23rd to April 8th, 2020 as corpus sources, randomly selects 39 COVID-19 reports, and makes a contrastive study of hedges among them, aiming at exploring the similarities and differences in the use of hedges in COVID-19 reports selected from Chinese and American mainstream newspapers and further revealing their influencing factors.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ies.v16n1p42
Journal Metrics
h-index : 62
i10-index: 604
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- AcademicKeys
- ACNP
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- Berkeley Library
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- Copyright Clearance Center
- CrossRef
- DESY Publication Database
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
- Educational Research Abstracts
- Electronic Journals Library
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Ghent University Library
- Harvard Library
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalGuide
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- LSE Library
- MIAR
- Microsoft Academic
- Mir@bel
- NewJour
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- OAJI
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Polska Bibliografia Naukowa
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SOBIAD
- Southwest-German Union Catalogue
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- USask Library
- VOCEDplus
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- ies@ccsenet.org