Teachers’ Opinions on the Evaluation of ELT Teachers’ Books


  •  Haedong Kim    

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify differences in opinions on the evaluation of ELT teachers’ books between pre-service and in-service teachers. In literature, it has been argued that the development of teachers’ books for EFL teachers can be assisted by the results of a needs analysis. A total of 65 pre-service and 50 in-servicesecondary school teachers from South Korea took part in a survey. There was a high level of agreement for the 22 criteria-items that asked for the evaluative opinions between two groupsas shown through the correlation.85. However, there were statistically different opinions. The pre-service teachers stressed the importance of clear objectives for each lesson, but the in-service teachers emphasized the need for the inclusion of process tests in teachers’ books. Interestingly, there were also different opinions on the use of a teacher’s book. The results from semi-structured interviews revealed that the former plan to use the teacher’s book for their classroom teaching in the future whereas the latter responded that their own notes would be somewhat more useful than teachers’ books. To conclude, it can be proposed that greater emphasis should be placed on gauging preferences of certain groups of teachers in specific EFL contexts for the development of teachers’ books.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • ISSN(Print): 1916-4742
  • ISSN(Online): 1916-4750
  • Started: 2008
  • Frequency: monthly

Journal Metrics

Citation Metrics (for informational purposes only; sourced from Google Scholar as of May 2026):

1. Citations (May 2026): 112462

2. h-index (May 2026): 145

3. i10-index (February 2025): 1811

*Note: Citation metrics vary significantly across indexing platforms. These figures are provided transparently and should not be used for cross-database comparisons. For methodological details, please refer to the official  Google Scholar Metrics documentation.

Contact