Online Proctoring of High-Stakes English Language Examinations: A Survey of Past Candidates’ Attitudes and Perceptions
- David Coniam
- Leda Lampropoulou
- Angeliki Cheilari
Abstract
This paper reports reactions by candidates to the use of online proctoring (OLP), ‘invigilation’, in the delivery of high-stakes English language examinations.
The paper first sets the scene in terms of the move from face-to-face to online modes of delivery. It explores the challenges and benefits that both modes offer, in terms of accessibility, fairness, security and cheating.
Evidence is then presented from a survey exploring the reactions to and perceptions of OLP by candidates who had taken an English language examination via OLP. A strong endorsement of OLP was generally recorded. Feedback revealed that respondents perceived OLP to be a more personal as well as a more efficient way of taking a test. Some pertinent negative comments from a smaller number of respondents could be construed as constructive and are also discussed. The results are indicative of a broad acceptance of OLP, pointing to strong future uptake of the OLP mode of test delivery.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/elt.v14n8p58
Journal Metrics
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- CNKI Scholar
- Educational Research Abstracts
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Harvard Library E-Journals
- IBZ Online
- INDEX ISLAMICUS
- JournalSeek
- JournalTOCs
- LearnTechLib
- Linguistics Abstracts Online
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- MLA International Bibliography
- NewJour
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- Ulrich's
- Universe Digital Library
Contact
- Gavin YuEditorial Assistant
- elt@ccsenet.org