Useful Numerical Statistics of Some Response Surface Methodology Designs
- Iwundu M. P.
Abstract
Useful numerical evaluations associated with three categories of Response Surface Methodology designs are presented with respect to five commonly encountered alphabetic optimality criteria. The first-order Plackett-Burman designs and the Factorial designs are examined for the main effects models and the complete first-order models respectively. The second-order Central Composite Designs are examined for second-order models. The A-, D-, E-, G- and T-optimality criteria are employed as commonly encountered optimality criteria summarizing how good the experimental designs are. Relationships among the optimality criteria are pointed out with regards to the designs and the models. Generally the designs do not show uniform preferences in terms of the considered optimality criteria. However, one interesting finding is that central composite designs defined on cubes and hypercubes with unit axial distances are uniformly preferred in terms of E-optimality and G-optimality criteria.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/jmr.v8n4p40
Journal Metrics
- h-index (December 2021): 22
- i10-index (December 2021): 78
- h5-index (December 2021): N/A
- h5-median (December 2021): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- Aerospace Database
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- Civil Engineering Abstracts
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- DTU Library
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- IDEAS
- Infotrieve
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- MathGuide
- MathSciNet
- MIAR
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- RePEc
- ResearchGate
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SocioRePEc
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- WorldCat
Contact
- Sophia WangEditorial Assistant
- jmr@ccsenet.org