Exploring College Students' EFL Learning Engagement in the Context of Blended Learning
- Fang Liu
Abstract
Engagement is a leading indicator of learning performance and outcomes. Blended learning in College English courses in China has been prevalent for years, yet it is still necessary to explore and enhance student interest, motivation, and outcomes through further research. Given the critical impact of academic engagement on student success, investigating how students engage in blended learning activities is important. This research presented English language learners' engagement in blended learning behaviorally, cognitively, and emotionally between online learning and in-person delivery modalities. It aimed to improve the instructional pedagogies to engage English language learners not only behaviorally, cognitively, but emotionally as well. The research aimed to help teachers gain a comprehensive understanding that will enable them to adjust current methods and identify more effective delivery strategies for improved outcomes. Learners' Engagement in Foreign Language Classroom, developed by Hiver et al. (2020), is taken in this research. In total of 223 EFL students in a Chinese university participated in this survey. The study has some main findings: in the EFL blended learning, online learning shows lower cognitive engagement but higher emotional engagement than in-person learning; blended EFL Learning engagement wasn't affected by gender or degree program levels; there are significant differences between online and in-person learning on the behavioral and cognitive engagement. According to the results, some pedagogical implications were discussed.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/elt.v18n6p1
Journal Metrics
Citation Metrics (for informational purposes only; sourced from Google Scholar as of May 2026):
1. Citations (May 2026): 112462
3. i10-index (February 2025): 1811
*Note: Citation metrics vary significantly across indexing platforms. These figures are provided transparently and should not be used for cross-database comparisons. For methodological details, please refer to the official Google Scholar Metrics documentation.
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- CNKI Scholar
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Harvard Library E-Journals
- IBZ Online
- INDEX ISLAMICUS
- JournalSeek
- JournalTOCs
- LearnTechLib
- Library and Archives Canada(LAC)
- Linguistics Abstracts Online
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- MLA International Bibliography
- NewJour
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- Ulrich's
- Universe Digital Library
Contact
- Gavin YuEditorial Assistant
- elt@ccsenet.org