Abstract

Soil acidity is one of the major soil constraints for the grain-growing industry in Australia and around the globe. While surface liming is widely adopted, it has been proven ineffective for the timely amelioration of subsoil acidity. There is a growing interest in finding alternative approaches for the effective amelioration of subsoil acidity, especially for low-rainfall regions. In a controlled environment and a field experiment, we examined whether the combined application of lime and gypsum would be more effective than lime alone under no-till (NT) and shallow strategic tillage (ST) systems for reducing the impact of soil acidity and increasing grain yield.

The controlled environment experiment highlighted that lime increased soil pH and decreased the soil exchangeable aluminium concentration (EAC) which resulted in significantly better root growth. In the field experiment, we found that the lime plus gypsum treatment, in most cases, did not significantly affect grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE) or grain quality compared to the lime treatment alone. Lime incorporation with a shallow ST was more effective in increasing soil pH and decreasing EAC at 10–20 cm depth, compared to the surface application of lime without tillage. However, ST did not affect the grain yield and WUE of wheat in 2017 and 2018 and significantly decreased the grain yield and WUE of canola in 2019 and barley in 2020. We found that measurements of either soil pH or EAC were equivalent in their ability to explain and predict the root growth of major grain crops. The results indicate that soil pH is the simplest indicator for grain growers to measure the improvement of soil acidity with liming and its impact on root growth and crop productivity. We recommend the application of lime as the preferred amendment on acidic sands, while shallow ST should be avoided in the low rainfall region. Further studies involving deep ST are warranted.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.