Effects of Emulsifier and Multi-enzyme in Different Energy Densitydiet on Growth Performance, Blood Profiles, and Relative Organ Weight in Broiler Chickens
- Jin Ho Cho
- PingYo Zhao
- In Ho Kim
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of emulsifierand multi-enzyme in different energy density diet on growth performance, blood profiles, and relative organ weight in broiler chickens. A total of five hundred and forty2-d-oldmale Ross broilers (BW of 42.4 ±1.3 g) wereused in a 35-d experiment and randomly divided into 5 treatment groups: 1) NC [low energy diet, 3% tallow, ME = 3000 (1 to 21 d) and 3100 kcal/kg (22 to 35 d)], 2) PC [high energy diet, 5.5% soybean oil, ME = 3150 (1 to 21 d) and 3250 kcal/kg (22 to 35 d))], 3) P1 (NC+0.1% multi-enzyme), 4) P2 (NC + 0.05% emulsifier), 5) P3 (NC + 0.1% multi-enzyme + 0.05% emulsifier). Multi-enzymecontained ?-galactosidase, galactomannase, xylanase, and beta-glucanase. Emulsifier was a commercial product named Prosol® which wassodium stearoyl-2-lactylate.There were 9 replications per treatment with 12 birds per pen. From d 0 to 21, body weight gain (BWG) in PC and P1 treatments increased (P < 0.05) compared with NC treatment. From d 22 to 35, feed intake (FI) was greater (P < 0.05) in P3 treatment than PC treatment. On d 35, triglyceride concentration in PC, P1 and P3 treatments was greater (P < 0.05) compared with NC treatment. No differences were observed on white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and glucose concentration. The relative weight of the spleen was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in P3 treatment compared with PC treatment. Furthermore, the relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius in P3 treatment was higher (P < 0.05) than PC, P1 and P2 treatments. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that emulsifier andmulti-enzymein low-density diets can partially improve growth performance, triglyceride, and relative organ weight in broiler chickens, which can counterpart the negative effects caused by the decreased nutrient concentration.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/jas.v4n10p161
Journal Metrics
- h-index: 67
- i10-index: 839
- WJCI (2022): 1.220
- WJCI Impact Factor: 0.263
Index
- AGRICOLA
- AGRIS
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- Berkeley Library
- CAB Abstracts
- CiteFactor
- CiteSeerx
- CNKI Scholar
- Copyright Clearance Center
- CrossRef
- DESY Publication Database
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- IDEAS
- Index Copernicus
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalTOCs
- KindCongress
- LIVIVO (ZB MED)
- LOCKSS
- Max Planck Institutes
- Mendeley
- MIAR
- Mir@bel
- NLM Catalog PubMed
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- OAJI
- Open J-Gate
- OUCI
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Polska Bibliografia Naukowa
- Qualis/CAPES
- RefSeek
- RePEc
- ROAD
- ScienceOpen
- Scilit
- SCiNiTO
- Semantic Scholar
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Southwest-German Union Catalogue
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- SUDOC
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- Trove
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- WorldCat
- WorldWideScience
- WRLC Catalog
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Anne BrownEditorial Assistant
- jas@ccsenet.org