Effect of Plant Density on the Water Use Efficiency and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. Cv. Spunta) in the Jordan Valley
- Nabeel Mohammad Bani-Hani
- Jalal “Ahmed Said” Al-Tabbal
- Moawiya Ahmad Haddad
- Hammad Khalifeh Aldal’in
- Ahmad H. Al-Fraihat
- Hussein Hussein Alhrout
- Hazem Sharef Hasan
- Fawzi M. Aldabbas
Abstract
Plant density affected yield, quality and water use efficiency. Little information describing plant density to optimize yield and quality of potato production is available in the Jordan Valley. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of plant density on the yield and yield components of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar “Spunta” grown in the middle of the Jordan Valley. Five different densities of plants (41,600 plants ha-1 (D1), 56,000 plants ha-1 (D2), 83,200 plants ha-1 (D3), 28,000 plants ha-1 (D4), and 41,600 plants ha-1 (D5) were randomly distributed over five replicate sites during the growing season from November 2013 to March 2014. Plant height, number of branches, fresh and dry weight of potato plants, tuber number, tuber weight, total yield, specific gravity and water use efficiency of potato plant grown under different plant density were measured. It was found that the productivity of potato increased with increasing plant density, with the highest total, marketable, and non-marketable yields being obtained at densities of 83,200 seeds ha-1, and the lowest occurring at 41,600 seeds ha-1, which equated to total fresh yields of 45.1 and 25.3 tons ha-1, respectively. The highest water use efficiency for marketable yield (11.9 kg m-3) was obtained at a density of 83,200 seeds ha-1, whereas the lowest water use efficiency (7.5 kg m-3) was obtained at a density of 41,600 seeds ha-1. The specific gravity ranged from 1.04 to 1.08 and the average tuber weight ranged from 77.02 g at a density of 83,200 seeds ha-1 to 115.84 g at a density of 28,000 seeds ha-1.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/jas.v10n12p203
Journal Metrics
(The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations)
- Google-based Impact Factor (2018): 2.28
- h-index (December 2018): 31
- i10-index (December 2018): 304
- h5-index (December 2018): 22
- h5-median (December 2018): 27
Index
- ACNP
- AGRICOLA
- AGRIS
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CAB Abstracts
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- CrossRef
- DESY Publication Database
- DTU Findit (DTU Library)
- EBSCOhost
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- FindIt@Bham (UoB Library)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- HOLLIS (Harvard Library)
- Index Copernicus
- Infotrieve (Copyright Clearance Center)
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalTOCs
- Library of Congress
- LIVIVO (ZB MED)
- LOCKSS
- LSE Library
- Max Planck Institutes
- Mendeley
- MIAR
- Mir@bel
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- OAJI
- Open J-Gate
- OskiCat (UCB Library)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Southwest-German Union Catalogue
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- StarPlus (UoS Library)
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- Trove
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- University Library (USask)
- WorldCat
- WorldWideScience
- WRLC Catalog
- Zeitschriften daten bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Anne BrownEditorial Assistant
- jas@ccsenet.org