Abstract

This study examines how university language centres (ULCs) use visual content on Instagram to convey the values of social inclusion. The analysis focuses on four ULCs affiliated with either the Association of University Language Centres in the UK and Ireland (AULC) or the Italian counterpart, Associazione Italiana Centri Linguistici Universitari (AICLU). Using a mixed-methods approach (eye-tracking data combined with thematic image coding), the study investigates: (1) whether and what images of inclusion are recognised by participants; (2) how recognisable and impactful they are for users similar to ULC audiences; (3) what type of conceptualisation of the specific values of inclusion are prototypically recognised by the group of participants.

Findings reveal that while informants recognise inclusive imagery, it remains limited. Representations of ethnic, age, professional, and socio-economic diversity are more common than those of gender identity or diverse ability. Eye-tracking data indicate that the semantic traits conveyed by group images, particularly those showing intergenerational or professional variety, are more prototypical in informants’ conceptualisation of inclusivity. UK-based ULCs tend to use more visually impactful and inclusive content, while Italian centres present a less hybrid, more centre-specific and functional identity.

The paper also reflects on the terminology used in inclusion discourse, proposing the use of a new blended term for disability: divability, which values diversity without reinforcing deficit-oriented language. This neologism, inspired by both linguistic economy and positive framing, is offered as a stimulus for further reflection.

The study concludes with a discussion of the communicative and ethical implications of visual representation in language education, outlining directions for future research on user perception and inclusive design.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.