Islamic Versus Conventional Banks in Lebanon: An Empirical Study of Credit Risk Management
- Boutheina Hachem
- Hiyam Sujud
Abstract
The aim of this research is to compare conventional and Islamic banks in various aspects of credit risk management processes. The study used 200 questionnaires, collected from 21 traditional banks and 4 Islamic banks in Lebanon. The results found that differences in the various issues of credit management between Islamic and conventional banks. Islamic banks are more understanding, aware, and cautious in their approach than traditional banks. Islamic banks are more efficient in assessing and analyzing credit risk than conventional banks. Lastly, Islamic banks are more used to credit risk mitigation than traditional banks.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ijef.v10n8p53
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Journal Metrics
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- Berkeley Library
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- Copyright Clearance Center
- Directory of Research Journals Indexing
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- EconBiz
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Harvard Library
- Harvard Library E-Journals
- IBZ Online
- IDEAS
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- NewJour
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- RePEc
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SocioRePEc
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Michael ZhangEditorial Assistant
- ijef@ccsenet.org