An Analysis of Scientific Research Performance in Italy: Evaluation Criteria and Public Funding
- Gennaro Guida
Abstract
In the last ten years, the assessment of scientific research has been useful for two main reasons: first to provide researchers with a shared methodology able to assess scientific productions and second to enable governments to locate investments where they yield the best results. The aim of this article is to investigate the methodology used to assess academic performance in Italy, focusing on the one hand on its application to economic sciences and on the other on the way in which it influences the distribution of the budget and the future performance of an institution. In this regard, an analysis of sample data extracted from the well-known Scopus database raises doubts about the advisability of linking the distribution of funds to the evaluation of the quality of the research.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ijef.v10n7p45
Journal Metrics
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- Berkeley Library
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- Copyright Clearance Center
- Directory of Research Journals Indexing
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- EconBiz
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Harvard Library
- Harvard Library E-Journals
- IBZ Online
- IDEAS
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- NewJour
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- RePEc
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SocioRePEc
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Michael ZhangEditorial Assistant
- ijef@ccsenet.org