Knowledge and Application of Nursing Ethical Principles by Nurses at an Intermediate Hospital, Namibia
- Ottilie N. Niikondo
- Kristofina Amakali
- Hileni N Niikondo
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nurses are to possess the knowledge and dutifully apply nursing ethical principles of respect for person, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice in caring for clients. Incidents that portray poor knowledge and application of nursing ethical principles have been previously reported at health facilities in Namibia.
AIM: To assess the knowledge and application of ethical principles of nursing by nurses in rendering care to patients at Onandjokwe Intermediate Hospital, Oshikoto region in Namibia.
METHODS: A Cross-sectional descriptive, and analytical methodology was applied to describe the knowledge and application of nursing ethical principles by nurses, among a study population of 257 nurses, of which 107 were registered nurses and 150 were enrolled nurses- a subcategory of qualified nurses and out of which 37 declined to participate in the study. The data were collected from the remaining all population sample of 220 all nurses. Descriptive statistics on the respondents’ knowledge and applications of ethical principles, and the relationship of the respondents’ demographic characteristics as independent variables and the knowledge and applications of ethical principles as dependent variables were analyzed.
RESULTS: The findings revealed poor knowledge and poor application of ethical principle of respect for person or autonomy (42%; 27,9%), non-maleficence (45.4%; 54.8%), beneficence (48.8%; 38.8%) and justice (40.5%; 43.4%) among the respondents. A significance association was found between good knowledge of non-maleficence and being a registered nurse with p-value =0.01, as well as of good knowledge and working experience of five years and more with a p=0.01 and p=0.02 respectively. Male nurses were also more knowledgeable about justice (p-value=0.03) than the female counterparts.
CONCLUSION: The study revealed poor knowledge and poor application of all four ethical principles among the respondents.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v16n9p12
Journal Metrics
- h-index: 88 (The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations)
- i10-index: 464
- WJCI (2022): 0.897
- WJCI Impact Factor: 0.306
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CNKI Scholar
- Copyright Clearance Center
- DBH
- EBSCOhost
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GHJournalSearch
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- Index Copernicus
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalTOCs
- LIVIVO (ZB MED)
- MIAR
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- SafetyLit
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- UniCat
- UoB Library
- WJCI Report
- WorldCat
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Erica GreyEditorial Assistant
- gjhs@ccsenet.org