Drawbacks of Traditional Environmental Monitoring Systems
- Sadiku Aminu Sani
- Amina Ibrahim
- Abuhuraira Ado Musa
- Muntaka Dahiru
- Muhammad Ahmad Baballe
Abstract
Traditional methods for evaluating water quality have a number of drawbacks. They need expensive, specialized equipment as well as knowledgeable employees first. Second, data loss may result from human error. Thirdly, because people rather than algorithms will be analyzing the obtained data, these schemes cannot foresee future patterns. Additionally, changes in the characteristics of water may result from the sample transit process. Therefore, it is challenging to consistently check water quality using outdated monitoring techniques. The disadvantages of traditional environmental monitoring techniques have been covered in this study.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/cis.v16n3p30
Journal Metrics
WJCI (2022): 0.636
Impact Factor 2022 (by WJCI): 0.419
h-index (January 2024): 43
i10-index (January 2024): 193
h5-index (January 2024): N/A
h5-median(January 2024): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- DBLP (2008-2019)
- EBSCOhost
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- Infotrieve
- LOCKSS
- Mendeley
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- ResearchGate
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- The Index of Information Systems Journals
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- WJCI Report
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- cis@ccsenet.org