Game Playing: Proposing and Developing Queen Challenge Puzzle Game from 1 to 25 Levels
- Hussain Mohammad Abu-Dalbouh
- Fahad Almansour
- Nehal Aldowighri
Abstract
In recent decades, massive improvements in graphic sophistication have begun to produce declining returns. The creative focus in game development has shifted to artificial intelligence. The queens’ task game is part of a sequence of popular games. It is the challenge of putting n chess queens on a game board such that no two queens are threatening each other. The plan does not involve two queens sharing the same row, column or diagonal. Each column contains exactly one queen, each row contains exactly one queen, and each diagonal contains exactly one queen. For every level in the game, there are many ways to solve it. For example, there are 92 solutions to the 8×8 problem. There are many levels in the literature, but each level should be downloaded separately. Thus, it causes a lot of difficulties for players, and they should download each level to complete the challenge. This will lead to more time and effort being spent by the players, and the cost of each level will cost the players more and more. As a result, the number of players who want to play this game will decrease. The aim of this paper is to incorporate a number of levels in order to save time, money and effort by downloading each level separately. This paper also aims to develop the proposed prototype and display all the solutions while playing a puzzle game at any level. The proposed game was tested by a questionnaire-based empirical study. Descriptive statistics on the questions revealed that the players had achieved the objectives of the game by applying their skills and knowledge and that the players had positive emotions about the effectiveness of the proposed game.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/cis.v14n2p87
Journal Metrics
WJCI (2022): 0.636
Impact Factor 2022 (by WJCI): 0.419
h-index (January 2024): 43
i10-index (January 2024): 193
h5-index (January 2024): N/A
h5-median(January 2024): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- DBLP (2008-2019)
- EBSCOhost
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- Infotrieve
- LOCKSS
- Mendeley
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- ResearchGate
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- The Index of Information Systems Journals
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- WJCI Report
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- cis@ccsenet.org