Service Broker-Based Architecture Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Service Level Agreement
- Imane Haddar
- Brahim Raouyane
- Mostafa Bellafkih
Abstract
With the on-going trends of the telecom services, the number of service providers with similar functionalities is undergoing a rapid growth. The customers face the difficulty to decide which service provider can satisfy their needs and full their requirements. Negotiating contracts between involved parts, and hiding heterogeneity in the distributed network environment has been challenging for telecom operators and service providers. Different languages exist to describe the Service Level Agreement (SLA), which is a contract between a service provider and a customer. However, since each service provider expresses his SLA in his own way, it disrupts the customer's choice of the best service provider, and leads to a bad contract management. In this respect, we propose a novel architecture for service selection, and SLA management between different stakeholders in our network architecture. The idea is to set up a smart broker where we implemented a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method to maximize utility function so that the customer can choose services with required QoS performances. We also came up with the idea of settling a negotiation model for the SLA, and a context based SLA contract ontology in IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) network is also proposed to provide users with a clear model to express their requirements and preferences. Moreover, we used the New Generation Operations Systems and Software (NGOSS) Framework to model and analyze networks and services actions. To better understand the relationship and the projection of NGOSS Framework and IMS platform, we introduce an SLA management and monitoring architecture in IMS network.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/cis.v13n1p20
Journal Metrics
WJCI (2022): 0.636
Impact Factor 2022 (by WJCI): 0.419
h-index (January 2024): 43
i10-index (January 2024): 193
h5-index (January 2024): N/A
h5-median(January 2024): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- DBLP (2008-2019)
- EBSCOhost
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- Infotrieve
- LOCKSS
- Mendeley
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- ResearchGate
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- The Index of Information Systems Journals
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- WJCI Report
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- cis@ccsenet.org