Note on Redshift and the Principle of Conservation of Energy
- Francois Danis
Abstract
Redshift has always been associated with the Doppler effect, but sound waves and electromagnetic waves are different; if the association is wrong, the recessional speeds observed in the universe could be wrong.
When redshift is observed, the energy of the photon is dropping; that change of energy cannot be explained by the Doppler effect. After a short history of the link Redshift-Doppler, the Ives-Stilwell experiment will be reinterpreted as a proof of special relativity, not a proof of the Doppler effect. A new proposal is presented: because of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, there must be a potential field to explain that acceleration. A change of potential along that field could explain the change of energy corresponding to the redshift.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/apr.v17n1p77
Journal Metrics
Google-based Impact Factor (2017): 3.90
h-index (November 2017): 17
i10-index (November 2017): 33
h5-index (November 2017): 12
h5-median (November 2017): 19
Index
- Bibliography and Index of Geology
- Civil Engineering Abstracts
- CNKI Scholar
- CrossRef
- EBSCOhost
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Google Scholar
- Infotrieve
- LOCKSS
- NewJour
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Ulrich's
- Universe Digital Library
- WorldCat
Contact
- William ChenEditorial Assistant
- apr@ccsenet.org