We Proof: 1. Hubble’s Law Opposes to Big Bang Theory; 2. Hubble’s Law Can Be Deduced With No Space Expansion

  •  Sean Yuxiang Wu    


Hubble's law has been considered as the scientific basis of the one atom exploding Big Bang Theory (BBT) for nearly hundred years. But with simple mathematical model we proved that the Hubble’s law does not correctly describe the expanding Universe suggested by the BBT. And we found a lot of wrong observing reports that were based on the calculation of Hubble's law, which strongly supported our arguments. That is why we tried to explain the Hubble's observing results from a different point of view, namely Velocity of Observed Image (VOI) of celestial body. A new mathematic model was built to replace the calculation model of the cosmic redshift that is the essence of Hubble's law. This model does not require the condition of the expanding of the Universe, which tells us again that Hubble's law does not support BBT.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • ISSN(Print): 1916-9639
  • ISSN(Online): 1916-9647
  • Started: 2009
  • Frequency: semiannual

Journal Metrics

Google-based Impact Factor (2017): 3.90
h-index (November 2017): 17
i10-index (November 2017): 33
h5-index (November 2017): 12
h5-median (November 2017): 19

Learn more