Abstract

The main purpose of judgment is to protect the right and performing justice. The judgment is the tool to operate the justice and judge also the same as others is under the failure and fault. If any verdict is released in a judgment result that is accompanied with error, there is no doubt that it should be judged again juristically, therefore to have a vote free of error, the recession of judgment is predicted. Therefore in such condition that the law allows the voting court to be able to release adequate vote by considering the discovered realties about the struggle subject and ignoring previous vote and releasing the new verdict. In this article we try to evaluate and compare the judgment recession in Iran and French law weak and strength points so that if required it is regarded by the respected legislator of that country law.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.