When Winning is Everything: Majoritarian Electoral System and Political Vigilantism in Contemporary Ghanaian Politics
- Owusu Nkrumah Daniel
- Ebenezer Barnes
Abstract
This article examines the persistence of political vigilantism in Ghana’s electoral politics by situating it within the institutional dynamics of the majoritarian first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system. While Ghana is widely regarded as a democratic outlier in Africa due to its record of peaceful elections and democratic alternation of power, recurrent episodes of electoral violence and vigilantism continue to undermine its electoral integrity. Drawing on secondary data, such as electoral records, legal documents, and existing scholarly literature, the study interrogates how the Ghanaian electoral system shapes political behaviour, particularly the resort to extra-legal strategies by political actors. The findings indicate that the winner-takes-all nature of the FPTP system, where even narrow defeats result in complete political exclusion, motivates electoral violence. This structural incentive encourages political parties, especially the dominant New Patriotic Party and the National Democratic Congress, to mobilize vigilante groups, mostly unemployed and poor youth, as instruments for vote protection, opponent intimidation, and control of electoral spaces.
This study further demonstrates that the concentration of executive powers, two-party dominance, localized constituency competition, and recurring electoral legitimacy disputes collectively reinforce vigilantism as a rational response to the institutional flaws, insecurity and mistrust in state agencies, particularly the Electoral Commission and security services. Although legal measures such as the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act 2019 have been introduced to address the symptoms rather than the structural roots of the problem. The article concludes that meaningful reduction of political vigilantism in Ghana requires electoral and institutional reforms, including proportional representation, which has proven its inclusivity, strengthened trust in democratic governance, and reduced violence.
- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/jpl.v19n2p67
Journal Metrics
h-index (2017): 14
i10-index (2017): 39
h5-index (2017): 9
h5-median (2017): 11
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- Berkeley Library
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Ghent University Library
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- HeinOnline
- INDEX ISLAMICUS
- Infotrieve
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalGuide
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- MIAR
- Mir@bel
- NewJour
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Pubmed journal list
- RePEc
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- WorldCat
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- William TaiEditorial Assistant
- jpl@ccsenet.org