A Systems Thinking based Sustainable Business Model Framework –An Appropriate Approach for the Design of Sustainable Business Models in Start-Up Consulting
- David P. Muller
- Michael Holzner
- Siegfried G. Zurn
Abstract
The Business Model Canvas (BMC), originally developed by Osterwalder and Pigneur, has become a well-established and widely utilised tool for the development, modification, and visualisation of business models. While the Business Model Canvas provides an effective framework for designing business models, there remains a need to enhance the understanding of cause-and-effect relationships within the system, as well as to establish a holistic perspective on its impacts. This is particularly relevant for entrepreneurs and start-up advisors, as start-ups typically have fewer financial resources to mitigate or adapt to unsuitable decisions taken than established companies. Furthermore, many of today’s start-ups operate in highly complex and dynamic sectors, such as the digital economy, and often strive for a holistic view of sustainability, balancing economic, environmental, and social impacts.
This paper reviews the traditional Business Model Canvas and explores sustainable business models grounded in the Triple Bottom Line approach. It then introduces a Systems Thinking based Sustainable Business Model framework (STSBM) that offers a robust methodology for designing sustainable dynamic modern business models. Specifically, impact networks are proposed to align mental models, while scenario simulation and evaluation are presented as tools for managing complexity.
The paper outlines the process of model development, details the structural elements of the proposed framework, and suggests its practical application. By integrating these principles, the proposed framework aims to support the creation of sustainable business models that effectively address the intricate challenges faced by start-ups.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ibr.v18n1p54
Journal Metrics
h-index (January 2024): 102
i10-index (January 2024): 947
h5-index (January 2024): N/A
h5-median(January 2024): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- EBSCOhost
- EconBiz
- ECONIS
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- IBZ Online
- IDEAS
- Infotrieve
- Kobson
- LOCKSS
- Mendeley
- MIAR
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- RePEc
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SocioRePEc
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Kevin DuranEditorial Assistant
- ibr@ccsenet.org