Corporate Governance: Voluntary, Mandatory or a Hybrid Approach?
- Chih Khiam Ping
- Tan Seng Teck
Abstract
This paper addresses a dilemma in corporate governance. Indeed, corporate governance has been a hype in modern business world. They were designed to curb malpractices and foul play in corporations. However, many practitioners and academics alike have not come in terms for the best approach for corporate governance. This paper simplistically addresses this dilemma and examine briefly the varying approaches to corporate governance in modern business world. This is not an empirical piece but on the contrary it is a writing that address the intricate dilemma in corporate governance and perhaps to determine the trajectory of their future directions.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ibr.v13n1p233
Journal Metrics
h-index (January 2024): 102
i10-index (January 2024): 947
h5-index (January 2024): N/A
h5-median(January 2024): N/A
( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- ACNP
- ANVUR (Italian National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes)
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- CrossRef
- EBSCOhost
- EconBiz
- ECONIS
- EconPapers
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- EuroPub Database
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Google Scholar
- Harvard Library
- IBZ Online
- IDEAS
- Infotrieve
- Kobson
- LOCKSS
- Mendeley
- MIAR
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- RePEc
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SocioRePEc
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Universe Digital Library
- ZBW-German National Library of Economics
- Zeitschriften Daten Bank (ZDB)
Contact
- Kevin DuranEditorial Assistant
- ibr@ccsenet.org