Case Study: Helping Corporate Board Members Stay Diligent (Post Enron)


  •  Renee Pistone    

Abstract

The Enron financial scandal impacted Wall Street and Board rooms within multinational corporations. Board Members need guidance in order to prevent fraud and abuse. The attorney featured in the following hypothetical faces serious ethical dilemmas. This hypothetical is unique because it involves an attorney Board Member facing ethical problems within a large business organization, as opposed to a one-on-one attorney-client situation. Here, the attorney Board Member, has a significant financial stake in the outcome. Certain issues will be delved into and analyzed according to customarily accepted Ethical standards for Board Members. Later on, this article is supplemented by federal and state case law. Supplemental cases were specifically chosen to emphasize and relay certain key principles of black letter law. Also, this article offers Board Members some reasonable alternatives to follow in order to follow due diligence.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • ISSN(Print): 1833-3850
  • ISSN(Online): 1833-8119
  • Started: 2006
  • Frequency: bimonthly

Journal Metrics

Google Scholar Citations

h-index: 174

i10-index: 1295

WoS Reviewer Recognition

Clarivate - Web of Science

IJBM partners with Web of Science to recognize our reviewers' contributions. You can forward your review thank-you email to reviews@webofscience.com to automatically log your certified credits on your Web of Science Researcher Profile.

Contact