Overview of Surrogates to Measure Audit Quality

Fuad Elmahedi Hussein, Mustafa Mohd Hanefah

Abstract


After the collapse of Arthur Andersen in 2002, the auditing profession has faced increasing pressure fromexternal parties to enhance and improve audit quality. These pressures led to a continued need to study thefactors that affect audit quality. Until present, there is no agreement among researchers about the definition andfactors of audit quality. To date, the issue of how audit quality is measured remains a matter of controversy anddisagreement. Previous studies used alternatives to measure audit quality. This paper reviews both thearguments for and against for these studies. Although, the importance of these alternatives and its potentialcontribution on audit quality have been emphasized, they are not a justification to ignore audit characteristicsthat could have significant impact on audit quality. This paper contributes to audit literature and represents abrief overview of reviews both the arguments for and against of using audit quality alternatives in previousstudies over the past 30 years. Thus it provides a basis for discussing several potentially rich factors for futureresearch on audit quality.

Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n17p84

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

International Journal of Business and Management   ISSN 1833-3850 (Print)   ISSN 1833-8119 (Online)

Copyright © Canadian Center of Science and Education

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ccsenet.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.