Hofstede Revisited: Is Making the Ecological Fallacy when Using Hofstede’s Instrument on Individual Behavior Really Unavoidable?

Tor Grenness

Abstract


This paper suggests that avoiding the ecological fallacy is - under certain circumstances - possible. One problem
in (cross-cultural) research is that there are often two levels of theorizing (individual and country) that needs to
be taken into account when data are being analyzed and conclusions are drawn. Typically, as is the case with
Hofstede's (1980) well-known research, cultural values are measured on country level. Consequently, researchers
who make causal inferences from such group data to individual behaviors are making the ecological fallacy, i.e
they (most often) wrongly assume that relationships observed for groups necessarily hold for individuals. If,
however, a method could be found that could help determining how individuals behave from the study of
aggregated data, the usefulness of Hofstede's research (and research on aggregated data in general) from a
manager's point of view would definitely increase.
In this paper the problem of the ecological fallacy, as well as different methods of avoiding it is discussed, and a
particular solution of the problem is suggested.  


Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v7n7p75

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

International Journal of Business and Management   ISSN 1833-3850 (Print)   ISSN 1833-8119 (Online)

Copyright © Canadian Center of Science and Education

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ccsenet.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.