Geography Teachers’ Opinions Regarding the Teaching Field Knowledge Test in the Public Personnel Selection Exam
- Abdullah Türker
Abstract
The number of teacher candidates is increasing as a result of the excessive quotas given to departments that train teacher candidates and the right to teach different branches with pedagogical formation certificates. Therefore it becomes compulsory to hold selection exams in teacher appointments. The exams carried out during this selection process undergo changes over time both in number and content. While exams containing questions of general knowledge, general ability, and educational sciences were used in teacher appointments in Turkey since 2002, the field knowledge test has also been applied since 2013. Geography is also one of the branches in which the field knowledge exam is applied. This study aims to evaluate the field knowledge exam according to the views of geography teachers. The study conducted in a phenomenology pattern, one of the qualitative research methods, was carried out with 25 geography teachers determined by criterion sampling methods. The data collected through semi-structured interviews were analyzed by descriptive analysis method. Direct quotations are included to increase the reliability of the research. In line with the opinions of the geography teachers, it was determined that as it increases teacher competence, taking the field knowledge exam is important and necessary. The majority opinion is that increasing the number of questions in the field knowledge exam in 2019 increased the content validity of the exam. As it caused changes in the questions, the field knowledge exam duration was considered to be excessive by some participants. According to the views of the geography teachers, undergraduate education did not coincide with the scope of the field knowledge test. It was determined that most of the candidates went to the course in the exam preparation process in order to fill the deficiencies. As a result of the research, it is recommended that the number of questions in the field knowledge test, the content validity should increase further, and the effect of the field knowledge test on the scoring basis for appointment should be further increased.
- Full Text: PDF
- DOI:10.5539/ies.v14n1p52
Journal Metrics
h-index : 62
i10-index: 604
Index
- Academic Journals Database
- AcademicKeys
- ACNP
- BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)
- Berkeley Library
- CiteFactor
- CNKI Scholar
- COPAC
- Copyright Clearance Center
- CrossRef
- DESY Publication Database
- DTU Library
- EBSCOhost
- Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
- Educational Research Abstracts
- Electronic Journals Library
- Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (EZB)
- Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA)
- Genamics JournalSeek
- GETIT@YALE (Yale University Library)
- Ghent University Library
- Harvard Library
- Jisc Library Hub Discover
- JournalGuide
- JournalTOCs
- LOCKSS
- LSE Library
- MIAR
- Microsoft Academic
- Mir@bel
- NewJour
- Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD)
- OAJI
- Open J-Gate
- PKP Open Archives Harvester
- Polska Bibliografia Naukowa
- Publons
- Qualis/CAPES
- ResearchGate
- ROAD
- Scilit
- SHERPA/RoMEO
- SOBIAD
- Southwest-German Union Catalogue
- Standard Periodical Directory
- Stanford Libraries
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- The Keepers Registry
- UCR Library
- Ulrich's
- UniCat
- Universe Digital Library
- UoS Library
- USask Library
- VOCEDplus
- WorldCat
Contact
- Chris LeeEditorial Assistant
- ies@ccsenet.org