Education and Sustainability : The Case of Emotions Park

Firms working in the third millennium have to face the challenge of being more sustainable. The complexity and the multidisciplinary nature of sustainability also requires new and specific knowledge. This means the necessity of a critical rethinking of the education system in the way to provide the cognitive tools and applications needed for new generations to address environmental, economic, and social challenges. In this perspective, the role of the school it is crucial, above all, to encourage attention to include sustainability as a theme on educational programs, focusing on the promotion of its multiple dimensions. Interdisciplinary sustainability programs are emerging globally, but little is known about the learning in these educational contexts. Therefore, the current research explores training modules used in the activities of a park to verify how students can receive a sustainable education from primary school; whether and in which way education can be a driver for the promotion of sustainable development; and whether it is effective to insert eco-activities such as eco-games, eco-campus, and eco-sports in the training modules from primary school onwards. For this purpose, the paper employed a single case study approach using the Emotions Park as a teaching plan. In particular, game and sports constantly accompany the training process by creating interdisciplinary links with different study subjects (e.g., civic education, environmental education, communication). Through the eco-activities, an innovative way to promote environmental and sustainability education was explored as a training model. Outdoor play, observation, and stimulation of the senses have proved powerful learning tools, and key to the acquisition of skills. Research data were collected observing the behavior of a sample of 22 participants and through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with educators, employee and students. The empirical observation suggests that inserting the sustainability principles as a topic in didactic programs provides the cognitive tools and applications needed for the new generations to address environmental, economic, and social challenges.


Introduction
Sustainability is based on the simple principle: everything that we need for our survival and well-being depends, either directly or indirectly, on our natural environment.Sustainability creates and maintains the conditions under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic and other requirements of presents and future generations (Adams, 2006).
To achieve these conditions, sustainable individuals generate terms that allow an equitable access to the use of natural, environmental, social, economic, political and cultural resources (Ehrlich & Ehrlich, 2009); their consumption of these resources is moderate (De Young, 1996;Iwata, 2001), allowing everybody to have access to them.Sustainably-oriented people are also cooperative and assist others in case of need (Pol, 2002), which means that they are "altruistically" motivated (Schultz, 2001).In addition, education plays a paramount role in the emergence and support of environmental dynamics, which is why a fundamental shift in people's behavior is required (Oskamp, 2000).
Given the increasing prominence of education and sustainability in academic debates, this work presents the various aspects of these concepts and considers the possible synergies between them.More specifically, the aim of this study is to understand: In order to find answers to the above research questions, the eco-activities (eco-games, eco-sports and eco-campus) were analyzed after they were conducted within Emotions Park; the activities aimed to promote sustainable development by focusing on environmental and sustainability education.More specifically, these activities were mainly aimed at teachers of elementary and middle school students.This paper is organized as follows.First, a review of the literature concerning sustainability and education is provided.Second, the methodology applied is explained, and the results are then described.Finally, concluding remarks and some implications for education practice are presented.

Sustainable Development and Sustainability
The core idea of sustainable development was defined most influentially by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987) as "development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (p.43).The above definition is adopted in this paper because, first, in its broadest sense, this normative abstraction has been widely accepted and endorsed by thousands of governmental, corporate, and other organizations worldwide (Gladwin et al., 1995;Baker, 2016), and second is the definition adopted by the United Nations (UN).
The sustainable development is considered by some authors as multi-dimensional, incorporating different aspects of society, seeking environmental protection and maintenance of natural capital to achieve economic prosperity and equity for present and future generations (Kelly et al., 2004).
For other scholars, the sustainable development is seen as: the maintenance of essential ecological processes, preservation of genetic diversity and sustainable use of species and ecosystems (Tisdell, 1988); equal opportunities for future generations (Chichilnisky, 1996), a process of change in which the exploitation of resources, the direction of investments, orientation of technological and institutional change are made according to the future, considering present needs (Hove, 2004).
Over time, the notion of sustainable development has evolved as an integrating concept, an umbrella under which a set of inter-related issues can be gathered.This is a variable process of change that seeks the ultimate goal of sustainability itself.In the same context, sustainability is the ability of a human, natural or mixed system to resist or adapt to endogenous or exogenous change indefinitely (Dovers & Handmer, 1992), represented as a goal or end point (Hove, 2004).Therefore, to achieve sustainability, sustainable development is required (Prug & Assadourian, 2003).
According to Ayres (2008), sustainability is a normative concept about how humans should act in relation to nature, and how they are responsible for each other and future generations.In this context, it is noted that sustainability is conducive to economic growth based on social justice and the efficient use of natural resources (Lozano, 2012).
Often, sustainability is seen at two different levels: weak sustainability or strong sustainability.Weak sustainability can be interpreted as the extension of economic welfare (Neumayer, 2003), therefore, the economic capital produced by current generations can compensate for loss of natural capital for future generations (Fiorino, 2011).In contrast, strong sustainability is a paradigm of non-substitutability, in which there are natural systems that cannot be eroded or destroyed without compromising the interests of future generations (Fiorino, 2011).
If the existence of sustainability depends on their socioeconomic and environmental relationship, it can be seen as a major subject and addressed in different ways.Sachs (2002), for example, used eight types of sustainability (social, economic, ecological, spatial, territorial, cultural, national and international policy) to display the dimensions of what is called eco-development (p.96).
The concept of sustainability implies three different aspects or dimensions which: environmental, economic and social sustainability (Basiago, 1999;Munier, 2005).Generally, environmental sustainability can be described as environmental protection (Munier, 2005), and economic sustainability can be defined as economic growth and economic progress, although, as Munier asserts, "Economic growth does not necessarily mean a better living..." (p.17).Social sustainability is often related to problems such as poverty, social exclusion, unemployment, inequalities and the like not only in the present but also in the future (Ekins et al., 2008;Partridge, 2005).Moreover, on a general or basic level, can also be seen as: "A system of social organization that alleviates poverty, but in a more fundamental sense, however, social sustainability establishes the nexus between social conditions (such as poverty) and environmental decay..." (Basiago, 1999, p. 152).
Within the above dimensions, there is a lack of consensus on the terms sustainability and sustainable development.This is due to the fact that sustainability is used to describe the processes and activities (for example, sustainable finance, sustainable business, among others).In other cases, the activities aim to be sustainable, such as sustainable tourism, sustainable agriculture or sustainable buildings.Therefore, sustainable development mainly focuses on people and their well-being (Moldan et al., 2012).
Although there are several understandings, sustainability and sustainable development aim to pass on to future generations a stock of capital that is at least as large as our own generation has inherited from previous generations (Gaussin et al., 2013).

Sustainable Development and Education
Several studies that focus on education, learning and sustainable development have emerged in relation to the increasing recognition of the centrality of behavior to human beings (Foster, 2002;Vare & Scott, 2007).Sen (1999) considers education as the basic component for a truly sustainable socio-economic development.If it is true that human beings are central in sustainable development, then similarly this development may be achieved only if education becomes a component of the environment-economy-society concept.
The education centrality in the pursuit of sustainable development has been clearly highlighted by Kofi Annan (Secretary General for the United Nations) that stated "Our biggest challenge in this new century is to take an idea that seems abstract-sustainable development-and turn it into a reality for all the world's people" and by Koïchiro Matsuura (UNESCO's Director-General) "Education-in all its forms and at all levels-is not only an end in itself but it is also one of the most powerful instruments we have for bringing about the changes required to achieve sustainable development".
United Nations and UNESCO-its specialized agency for education for sustainable development (EDS)-began to give attention to this topic since 1992.The engagement continued with the UN Decade for ESD (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014) and currently with a strong strategic program (Annan-Diab & Molinari, 2017), the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.The 2030 Agenda, composed by 17 Goals, is an ambitious challenge and particularly interesting by an educational point of view: in fact, also if only the Sustainable Development Goal 4 (assume inclusive and equitable quality of education and promote lifelong opportunities for all) is specifically devoted to education, it clearly permeated all the others Goals.In the document "Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives" (UNESCO, 2017), this strong interdependence between the Goal 4 and the others clearly emerged.
The global communities and particularly the UNESCO engagement contributed to strongly highlight the relationship between sustainable development and education and the need that schools be more attentive to transfer to their students the awareness that sustainable development will not be possible to forget (Weybrecht, 2017).
Moreover, in the 2030 Agenda emerge also a clear interest for education for sustainable development in the early childhood years.The value to start early with education for sustainability is clear: the early childhood years are the time of the greatest and most significant developments in a person's life (Davis, 2009;Mustard, 2000).
Another challenge that affect the world from several decades is change.Scott & Gough (2003, pp. 113-116) identified three types of approaches that link the concepts of sustainable development, education and change: -the first approach assume that the problems humanity faces are essentially environmental, can be understood through science, and resolved by appropriate environmental and/or social actions and technologies.It is assumed that learning leads people to change their mind once facts have been established and are told what they are; -the second approach assumes that our fundamental problems are social and/or political, and that these problems produce environmental symptoms.Such fundamental problems can be understood by means of anything from social-scientific analysis to an appeal to indigenous knowledge.The solution in each case is to bring about social change, where learning and education are tools to facilitate choice between alternative futures.These futures can be specified based on present-day knowledge.Both these approaches have a long history and are attractive to pressure groups that advocate a shift to sustainability; -the third approach assumes that what is (and can be) known in the present is not adequate; desired "end-states" therefore cannot be specified.This means that any learning must be open-ended.Makrakis (2011) defined education for sustainable development as the learning needed to maintain and improve our quality of life and the quality of life of generations to come.It concerns equipping individuals, communities, groups, businesses, and government to live and act sustainably, as well as giving them an understanding of the environmental, social and economic issues involved (Makrakis, 2011) The overal of them th problems.protection

Sampli
The select for the stu and the sa provided compensat In addition were perfo deeper und    question: How would you define the term sustainability?Participants were able to respond with greater awareness, linking and justifying the concepts that emerged earlier, despite the young age of the sample analyzed.

Discussion and Conclusion
Increasingly, today's lifestyle imposes on adults, teens and children challenging rhythms of programmed activities that conflict with the rhythms of nature and physical and human sanity.
The Emotions Park seeks to recover in children or students a learning and emotional relationship with the places of nature.Knowledge of the natural environment in all its aspects (as suggested by the Unesco's proposed activities) can be a stimulus to taste and curiosity to appreciate it as an important personal asset and collective, as well as an opportunity to experience the training modules in alternative and constructive way.
The primary school students who participated in this project were involved in physical, cognitive and emotional as eco-activities.Outdoor play, observation, and stimulation of the senses have proved powerful learning tools, and key to the acquisition of skills.
On the other side, teachers have been able to transfer to students the awareness that they can help create a more sustainable future world by integrating the training plan with the Park's eco-games.
To strengthen this goal, it is necessary expand the teaching offerings to include topics on sustainability (Annan-Diab & Molinari, 2017) beginning in primary school (Davis, 2009) because learning and behavioral change are drivers for achieving sustainable thinking and living (i.e., learning to live sustainably), which is inextricably connected to transformative perceptions of learning (Makrakis, 2012).
The limits of this work concern, first, the youth of the analyzed in the park eco-activities, and second that we observed only one specific park working for the sustainable education.
The main practical implication of this study is that starting at primary school to educate students on sustainable behaviours, will be possible to have sustainable citizens and managers in the future.
As regards future research, the authors will be engaged to follow the Emotion Park development and to compare these eco-activities with similar ones around the world.
. Education for sustainable development represents a new vision of teaching and learning, a vision that helps people reconnect with nature by addressing A