Cognitive Comprehension of “ Beyond & Behind ” : An Experimental Study of Baghdad University

The present study analyzes two locative English prepositions behind and beyond from the cognitive semantic point of view. These prepositions pose a problem experienced by Iraqi undergraduates. The complexity of these two prepositions encourages the researcher to use the cognitive linguistics (CL) approach and its insights as developed by Evans and Tyler 2003 to test its validity and help the Iraqi students. The data analysis is quantitatively-based. Seventy second-year university students participate in this experimental study. The pre-test and post-test data are analyzed through SPSS statistical editor and the results show a progress of more than (0.05≤). The results of the questionnaire show a noticeable positive change in the students’ attitude toward CL approach and display the main source of difficulty that is related to perplexity in the usage of these prepositions. The effectiveness of CL approach in getting accurate comprehension of the English prepositions behind and beyond is proved by the results of this experiment.


Introduction
As second learners, Iraqi students face the problem of differentiating between behind and beyond.English prepositions are considered a major challenge for second language (L2) learners (Celce-Murcia & Larsen-Freeman, 1999).They are problematic because their semantics is difficult to be characterized.For example, "the teacher is behind the students" can be interpreted in quiet different ways.It can convey both physical and abstract meanings.These L2 learners are also absent from what Langacker (1987) assumes in his book Foundation of English Grammar that the relations coded by prepositions are better represented as being an image-schematic in nature rather than as linguistic prepositions.When dealing with space, linguistics often has focused on "small" words, or closed class forms, such as prepositions, whose meanings are not so easy to define.However, prepositions perform a crucial role in organizing conceptual content (Seskauskiene & Zilinskaite-Sinkuniene, 2015).
CL approach offers a semantic analysis not only for English prepositions, but also for other languages.It elicits the meaning of a preposition in three dimensions: first, it shows a preposition as a schematized representation of a spatial configuration between two entities.Second, it clarifies its abstract notion.Third, it represents the functional element of a preposition (Tyler & Evans, 2003).These visions of CL approach are going to be used in analyzing the English preposition behind and beyond to investigate the way CL approach is considered accurate and systematic when dealing with the English prepositions in question.

Aim of the Study
This study aims at testing the extent to which the explanation of CL principles can enhance the Iraqi L2 learners' awareness in apprehending the English prepositions.These learners have been studying English for more than 12 years.They do not have prior knowledge to CL approach, and are instructed about the English prepositions by memorizing them.

Limitation of the Study
This study is limited to second-year students of intermediate level in the department of English in Baghdad University during the academic year 2017/2018.Seventy students were volunteered to be the participants of this study.

Cognitive Linguistics (CL) and the Semantics of English Prepositions
This part of the study provides a comprehensive view of CL approach and its interpretation to the English prepositions.CL approach deals with language as a tool for organizing, processing, and conveying information.It is constructed in the early eighties by George Lakoff, Ron Langacker, and Len Talmy (Geeraerts & Cuyckens, 2010).Evans (2012) defines CL approach as the study of language, mind, and sociocultural experience which views language as a reflection of general aspects of cognition.It is best studied in the context of use that emerges from it.Evans illustrates the vision of CL approach, saying that meaning and form in the study of language are inseparable.He also clarifies the two main areas of CL concentrations: CL to grammar, which is the study of language organization, and cognitive semantics, which is the study of the conceptual structure of language.Ungerer and Schmid say that CL approach is "based on our experience of the world and the way we perceive and conceptualize it" (Ungerer & Schmid, 2001).In this vein, Rodriguez (2006) maintains that: "Cognitive semantics provides a framework to decompose metonymic and metaphoric language into the conceptual input domains, mappings between elements, organizing relations, and systematic entailments.For complex metaphors, it also helps understand the processes involved in invoking imagery, combining visual and linguistic references, and making inferences in conceptual integration."Hazrati et al. (2016) mention that "Metaphor refers to the relationship between two semantic areas in which one semantic area is expressed through another; in other words, in metaphor an abstract concept is experienced and understood based on tangible concept".
Language users develop a system of communicating and expressing meaning that drives dynamic interaction between humans and languages.This interaction is the main concern of CL approach (Verspoor & Boers, 2013).Each language has a unique system of communication that arranges the relations and spatial configuration of objects.The relations among objects create the need for humans to communicate.Humans do not perceive objects and their relations in a mere flat visual array.In order to get a better understanding, CL approach distinguishes the mechanisms of these relations as spatial scene, spatial relations, and spatial configurations.It also perceives physical and abstract views that can detect spatial scenes and metaphorical hints.In the spatial scene, there are a figure and a ground (Tyler et al., 2011).
Meanings do not exist alone by themselves far from the people who create and use them (Tyler & Evans, 2003).Tyler and Evans explain the relation between meanings and people as a proto-scene.The proto-scene is a CL insight that emerges from recurring human experiences with interpretations of the spatial configuration between entities in the world (Evans & Tyler, 2003).Generally, prepositions are polysemous repetitive words; they connect between entities, and pose challenges, especially for L2 learners (Celce-Murica & Larsen-freeman, 1999).Aajami (2018) finds that studying the preposition throughout analyzing their meaning by the CL approach increase their awareness in grasping their polysemy.
In English, prepositions construct the spatial relation among figures and grounds.Prepositions have a polysemy of a semantic network.The multiple meanings associated with English prepositions can be represented as being systematically related within a motivated semantic network (Tyler et al., 2011).Each usage of a preposition may attribute a specific meaning.The same preposition has a different meaning depending on the context (Rice, 1992).
Different spatial relations are extended from a central sense or prototype in systematic ways.For example, prepositions that describe a contact relation are likely to develop "rotated" senses (Boers, 1996, p. 22) (e.g."the book is on the table > the pen is on the table", "the dog is under the car > the key is under the car").In contrast, separated relations cannot develop "rotated" senses.
"The analysis of meaning needs to take into account the complex interplay between the senses of the particle relying on spatial configurations and the senses of the constituent verb stemming from the conceptual metaphor and metonymy" (Milošević & Pavlović, 2017).Figurative senses extend from spatial senses of a preposition through conceptual metaphors.Understanding the spatial senses helps explain why one preposition rather than the other is chosen to express a defined metaphor.A case in point is the hierarchy sense of under in "he served under the Queen", which reflects the metaphor of "high status up, low status down" (Boers & Demecheleer, 1998).Tyler and Evans (2004) emphasize CL approach in the comprehension of prepositions.They assert that CL approach can show the functional elements; the spatial configuration of prepositions can be represented in a schematic form, and it can clarify the encoded abstract notion of prepositions, as in: "the thief is behind the crime".They find the result that CL approach is more accurate and systematic when analyzing prepositions.Jacobsen, in her dissertation in (2012), asserts the benefit of CL for l2 learners.She finds that approaching the study of language from the perspective of CL can support that L2 learners get better comprehension and stable teaching practices.She also insists on the importance of CL approach in terms of the inseparability of form and meaning and the diversity of individuals in analyzing the scenes.CL uniqueness comes from the point that each individual can view and highlight part of the scene.Jacobsen agrees with other researchers on underlying the conceptual view that language can be of a particular use for second language learners.Zwarts (1995) identifies three areas of meaning that can be modified by the English preposition behind.It can be modified by a dimensional adjective as in "far behind the tree"; measure phrases as in "thirty meters behind the station"; or adverbs as in "right behind the pine tree".These multiple interpretations of behind come out of analyzing a region as a set of vectors.
Boers and Demecheleer (1998) find that there are central and figurative senses of behind.They also find that the pictorial representation of the preposition is preferable by cognitive semantics.According to Boers and Demecheleer, behind has a spatial sense, spatial relations, and a metaphorical sense.In the case of beyond, they identify the central meaning as a distance between two entities; one of them serves as a landmark for the other.Beyond has metaphorical senses as the abstract distance.Lindstromberg (2010) explains the meaning of the English preposition behind as "in back of" or "on the other side of", for example, "Our house is behind/ on the other side of the school".Behind always refers to a landmark that is relatively close to the subject.The landmark obscures the subject in the case of behind as it is mentioned in the following example: "Our house is behind the school".Lindstromberg shows that behind is used to refer to a low or flat landmark in a context of emphasis as in "keep behind the line".He also mentions the intrinsic and deictic points of view.Most of the things in the world have faces and backs.When one says, "the ball is behind the car"; this vantage point is the intrinsic point of view.It is for the lateral viewer when he is standing in forint of the car.Deictic point of view has nothing to do with the intrinsic orientation of an object.This point varies depending on where viewers are, or imagine they are; it is often called a deictic point of view.Lindstromberg refers to the metaphorical usage of behind.It is used when the agent is obscured or wishes to remain unknown e.g., "I wonder what the reasons were behind their absence".It is also used metaphorically to give support between two entities or between an agent and a land mark; "there were too much work behind the success of the film".Lindstromberg (2010) defines the English preposition beyond as "far away on the other side of" or "on the other side of and then more distance after that".Beyond entails three locations: the land mark location, the subject location, and the implicit standpoint.For example: A: "Where is the supermarket?"B: "It is beyond the hospital".The land mark is the hospital, and the subject is the supermarket.The place where A and B come across each other is the implicit standpoint.Lindstromberg explains the metaphorical usage of beyond.For example, "Lama's behavior is beyond any excuse" where beyond in this sentence implicates the meaning of "far from in the other side".In terms of time, Lindstromberg shows that beyond entails three meanings or forms as indicated in the following examples: "on the other side of", "at the other end of"."The recession may linger beyond the next three years".There is expectation of how much the recession will continue."Here, on the other side of Christmas, we find ourselves living in the same old world".Here, there are two sides of the Christmas before and after."Holi is the festival of color marking the beginning of summer, while at the other end of the year, Diwali marks the onset of winter".There are two occasions that mark the beginning and ending of summer and winter.Sultan (2014) finds that spatial scenes of the locative prepositions behind and beyond which have horizontal, back, front axes to the lateral viewer have their figurative extensions.These figurative extensions could be facilitated by examples of graded levels of abstraction.a.There is a man behind the tree.
b.The director behind the chaos.
When a land mark obscures the agent, behind is used metaphorically to refer to agents that are unknown or that might wish to remain unknown.c.There is a hospital beyond the bank.d.Her behavior is beyond my expectations.
Beyond means: far from, on the other side, out of the limits.Sultan shows that not all prepositions have a spatial scene.He claims that spatial scenes are made when a preposition offers a physical vantage point that will determine how one conceptualizes the scenes.Each vantage point offers one unique view.
Stasiūnaitė (2016) declares that words such as prepositions do not have meanings by themselves.Their meanings emerge from the context in which they are used.She also finds that CL approach has an essential role in organizing the conceptual content expressed by prepositions.

Experim
The study interpretin researcher items whic  test the students' information, ideas, and attitude toward CL approach.She also arranges an online survey to be filled by the participants before conducting the experiment.This offers the participants more flexibility in participating.To achieve the aim, the researcher prepares an experiment that involves three steps:

1)
showing the participants videos and power point slides that explain the principles of CL approach and its sights: the spatial scene, spatial relations, figurative sense, and a metaphorical language; 2) distributing pictures and asking the participants to identify the spatial scenes and relations using the two locative English prepositions behind and beyond.The students were asked to apply the meaning of behind and beyond in real life scenes; and 3) asking the participants to rephrase sentences with behind and beyond that contain physical and abstract views in order to develop their metaphorical languages.
The researcher adopts the quantitative method in collecting and analyzing the data.SPSS statistical editor; paired sample statistics is used to analyze the participants' scores in the pre-test and post-test.In order to save space, the researcher just mentions the result of the analysis of the participants' marks.

Participants and Procedures
The participants were seventy second-year students who are mostly intermediate level in English language.The students have not been taught anything about CL approach before.They also did not test the polysemy of English prepositions.The procedures were done as shown below: 1) The first step: the students were introduced to a brief introduction CL approach and they were further given the definition, principles and insights of the approach; 2) In the second step, they were exposed to the pre-test that contains three categories of questions: images to be analyzed, sentences to be rephrased, and gaps to be filled.The pre-test is set in order to check the way the participants treat the two English prepositions in terms of meaning and function; 3) In the third step, after the participants have done the experiment, they sat for the post-test which contains the same categories of the pre-test.The experiment continues in order to reveal the change in the participants' awareness as they dive deeper in the experiment; and 4) In the last step, there was a questionnaire of three questions to test the extent to which the participants' attitudes toward CL approach were changed.Further, the pre-test and post-test are set to check the participants' progress in grasping CL approach whereas the questionnaire is set to check the participants' attitude toward CL approach.

Pre-test
Seventy marks were collected by the researcher for the preliminary examination of the students' abilities in interpreting and analyzing the semantics of behind and beyond.It is clear that the students have simple ability to analyze the meaning of behind and beyond depending on the entities that are connected via a relation by these prepositions.Their marks also displayed prodigious difficulty in developing the meaning of these prepositions metaphorically.For detailed information about the questions of the pre-test, (see appendix A).
As long as the pre-test is done after the introductory part of the experiment, the result of the pre-test showed that all the students only have a simple clue about CL approach and its sights.It is obvious that most of students, ie., about 90%, depended on their initial knowledge when rephrasing the sentences or images.All participants, ie., 100%, failed to differentiate between the spatial and metaphorical senses.Besides, 40% of the participants had right answers regarding the choice between behind or beyond to complete the sentences.Their random choice of a preposition represents a clear piece of evidence to their lack of cognitive comprehension.The low achievement in the pre-test drives the researcher to pay much more attention to the current methodology to be more effective and clear when clarifying the meaning and usage of CL approach.

Post-test
After the pre-test, the researcher applied the detailed experiment in eight weeks that involved lectures, workshops, games and tests.Each week, there were three meetings of two hours and half for each session.The sessions were divided in three parts theoretical, practical, and representational.Those eight weeks were enough for the students to be familiar with CL approach.The researcher through the lectures showed videos and explained CL approach using the experiment of Tyler and Evans 2003.She also used schematic diagrams to best represent the meaning of prepositions.After finishing the theoretical part, the students were divided in groups to represent part of the theory theoretically and practically.They chose examples, pictures, and diagrams to illustrate the usage of behind and beyond.The students worked in groups during the workshops, and they analyzed and identified spatial scenes and relations in sentences and images.They also defined the abstract or the physical vantage point in a sentence or an image and represented some images in real scenes.Sentences with behind and beyond were rephrased by the students.During that time, students had a clear idea about CL approach.Then, they practiced developing the physical view to spatial relations and spatial configuration.
The post-test contains questions with images to be analyzed, sentences to be rephrased, and gaps to be filled (see appendix A).The marks were collected through a rubric set by the researcher.Throughout checking the results of the post-test and in comparison with pre-test, the researcher has noticed that the students have a remarkable development in the awareness of CL approach in.All students, i.e., 100% of the participants, could recognize if there is a spatial scene or not in the images and sentences; a matter which reflects that their responsiveness to the first step of comprehension is successfully done.Moreover, 82% of the participants showed important progress in differentiating the metaphorical usage of the prepositions in question.Besides, 95% chose the right choice of behind or beyond to complete the sentences correctly..055Note.If the difference between both tests is less than (0.05), then, the study is invalid.If the difference between both tests is more than (0.05), then, the study is valid Table 1, the SPSS analysis, shows the students' number and the results of both tests, the pre-test and post-test and the difference between them.The number of students is 70 and their average in the pre-test is 10.00 whereas the post-test is 13.47.The students show a progress of 3.47 marks.Since the difference between the two means of both tests shows a progress of more than (0.05); that is, this study is valid.The results are in agreement with the research of Evans and Tyler's (2003).This means that CL approach can make a remarkable positive change in students' comprehension of English prepositions.

Questionnaire
The questionnaire is set in order to show the difference of students' attitude toward the cognitive linguistic approach.Further, moving from unfamiliarity to cognition, it seems that the change in the questionnaire's results shows that human experience is enriched.Students' mental perception passes through an experiment that turns their observation about how cognitive linguistics offers a new insight of the semantics of English prepositions behind and beyond.The questionnaire is distributed before and after the experiment.
The questi thinks that Besides, 3 Moreover, beyond us toward usi

Conclusion
This study verifies the effectiveness of CL approach in grasping the semantics of English prepositions.Based on the result of pre-test and post-test in addition to the results of the questionnaire, it is quite apparent that students have achieved a significant growth in reaching the semantics of the English prepositions in question with a better aspect.This research recommends the following: First, applying CL approach is a necessity for bettering up the acquisition of English prepositions in classrooms.Second, teachers of English are invited to have a deep systematic view on CL in order to be able to apply the cognitive approach in classrooms.Finally, workshops and lectures should be held periodically with researchers and teachers who are concerned with this approach to always have updated information.
Figure 1 se figures are set b figure is taken fro Figure 4 Figure 8. T

Table 1 .
Table below, there is an accurate analysis of marks by SPSS statistical editor The difference between pre-test and post-test