Testing the Model of Relationship and Impact of Administrative Leadership on Human Resource Training and Customer Satisfaction : Structural Equation Modeling ( SEM )

The current study aimed to test and validate a proposed model of the impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction. This model included an external factor which is the administrative leadership, and an internal factor which is the customer satisfaction. The study also aimed to determine the role of human resource training as a mediating factor between the administrative leadership and customer satisfaction. For achieving these research objectives, the study used a quantitative approach to analyzing the data through the use of the structural equation modeling (SEM-AMOS) to test the validity of the proposed research model. The study achieved several results, the most important of which was that the administrative leadership had a positive impact on customer satisfaction. The study also provided evidence of the positive impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction through its positive impact on the training of human resources, which was used as a mediating factor.


Introduction
In terms of successful management is the one that has a sincere desire of work to reach and maintain the success, change the prevailing traditional organizational culture and its development under the surrounding progress.Such development comes only when the organization has an administrative leadership acquainted with the surrounding matters and having the qualification and performance, this is due to the consumer culture and consciousness that had in the past and dependence on quality as the main criterion for selection and preference (Aiyad, 2013).Accordingly, when the administrative leadership became higher within the organization the probability of success became grater to reach its objectives whether organizational or personal (Al-Khudr, 2005); the administrative leadership comes to influence on the others on the basis of its strength sources, which owned by placing in the organizational structure (Hraim, 2003).Whereas the banking system is considered as one of the pillars underpinning the economic system of the State, so its development is considered as an important developmentally requirement; given the actual intense competition and the marketing of banking services; which leaded many Libyan banks to pursue and adopt the idea and the concept of quality management, but in most of these banks are still suffering from distortions, failure and weakness in the used technology efficient as banking systems limited efficiency, as well as the lack of a communications network linking banks and branches which affects the efficiency of banking operations performance, in addition to continuously deficiencies in the training of human resources (Ben Gadara, 2013) which contribute in the development of the personnel capacities, skills and attitudes (Ben Ishi, 2012); furthermore there is a weakness in the material and moral incentives, which leads to the inability to attract and maintain efficient elements, as well as the lack of customer satisfaction with the quality of service provided by these banks due to their dissatisfaction with the physical aspects quality of the service as well as the quality of dealing (Mosbah, 2007).For developing this sector eliminating the failure and distortions, a strong administrative leadership with high management ability (Al-Hkimi, 2012), having sincere desire to change the followed traditional behavior shall be exist, because any action or change for the better is to discover and develop leaders known by the efficiency and performance (Mohamed & Akeel, 2010), to place the modern technical means and the client as its marketing strategic axe, as well as to train the human resources in the modern marketing concepts in order to continuously commercialize the banking service.
Therefore, the researcher believes that there are some obstacles and problems that might hinder the marketing of banking services such as the types of prevailing leadership and its strength sources that depend thereon, as well as less awareness of the personnel training in terms of the dimensions and criteria for evaluating the service quality by the customer when the service provided and then the impact on customer satisfaction.
Through the foregoing clarification of the role of the administrative leadership in the Organization, as well as the role of human resources training and the impact on customer satisfaction, the study problem can be formulated in question: Is there a positive relationship and impact of the administrative leadership on human resources training and customer satisfaction?
Branching from the main question following the previous sub-questions: Is there a positive relation and impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction?Is there a positive relation and impact of the leadership on the training of human resources?
Is there a positive relation and the impact of human resources training on to customer satisfaction?Does the human resources training play a mediator role in positive relation and impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction?

Research Objectives
To verify the real relation between the administrative leadership and customer satisfaction.
To test the real role of the training as medial variable in the relation between the administrative leadership and customer satisfaction.
To determine the relation between the administrative leadership and human resources training.
To evaluate the relation between human resources training and customer satisfaction.

Relation between Administrative Leadership and Customer Satisfaction
This paragraph will concern the administrative leadership as a potential factor through its power sources as first apparent factor (Structural, Experience, Personality, Bonus, Coercion) as a set of rules and dimensions that measure the power of the administrative leadership based on the classification (French & Raven, 1959), which is was a pioneer in this field.The classification of leader force is came from (Legitimacy, Reference, Charisma, Bonus, Coercion, Experience).Furthermore, the morals in this field suggest that the most important power sources and the most frequent is the (Legitimate, Information, Reference, Experience) (Al-Jmili, 2004) force.Regarding the leadership styles, it will be reliance on the classification as per its behaviors and methods and manners for influencing its employees as a second apparent factor of administrative leadership.Among these styles (Democratic, Bureaucratic, Free), and the extent of carrying such styles and impact on the behavior of personnel and their motivation towards the provision of quality services achieved to customer satisfaction being as more leadership styles, which depended by managers in organizations (Abbas, 2012).

Relation between Administrative Leadership and Human Resources Training
This paragraph will concern the administrative leadership as a potential factor through its styles and power sources as a n apparent factors and its relation with the training of human resources as a potential factor and as a (dependent) variable through three apparent factors (Knowledges, Capacities, & Rrends), especially which worked in the front desks and had direct contact with the customers, considering that any organization desired to achieve the required quality levels of service and ensured its continuity in the business world depends on processes to improve administrative systems and development of work as well as the development and training of its human resources.

Relation between Human Resources Training and Customer Satisfaction
This paragraph will concern the human resources training as a potential factor through three apparent factors (Knowledges, Capacities, & Rrends), with the dimensions and criteria of service quality evaluation, which assesses the customer the level of service quality then affecting the degree of his satisfaction, in particular persons who worked front desks an having direct contact with customers, which may have an impact on the www.ccsen dependent that the a depends on

Relatio
The resea satisfaction factor thro human res (Mediator) several ap factor or v

There is a
There is a There is an impact on

Resear
In this reg one of th informatio the purpos

Confir
The Struct test the res (1) the ch between th chi-square model a R

Constr
The emplo proposed b or greater by Hair et

Testing
In this stu objectives customer s 6. Results

(CFA)
6.  (Hair,Black than 0.5 (≥0.5 al.(2006).In a g the Theoretic udy used the and test the r satisfaction., these results i in Table 2.    of the quare ue of

Construct Validity and Reliability
In this study, we performed the factor lodgings for the items related to the model of the Customer satisfaction as shown in the modified model (Figure 5).The results show that the loadings for these items ranged from (.67 to .86), which were higher than 0.5 (≥ 0.5).The values of the reliability of these items also ranged from (.94 to .94), which was greater than 0.7 (≥ 0.7).Furthermore, the values of the divergent or discriminant validity of these variables that constitute up the factor of the human resources training were (.62, .63,.64,.53,.60),being higher or greater than 0.5 (≥ 0.5).Thus, these results indicate that the items of this factor of the Customer satisfaction are valid and reliable as shown in Table 4.  7, the ower em as of the variables represented by the rectangular shapes and their potential factors exemplified by the oval circuits were high and exceeded (.50).These are usually called saturations, loadings or estimates, which, in this study, ranged from the highest correlation (.84) between customer satisfaction and the variable of the quality of empathy to the lowest one (.55) between the administrative leadership and the variable of the free pattern.In addition, Table 6 presents the T value of each relation between the potential factors and variables that represent them.It can be seen that the T value was higher than (1.964) for all such identified relations, thus being statistically significant at (.05).Such results confirm the existing remarkable relations or correlations between the potential factors and their variables.

Testing the Correlations among the Main Factors in the Research Model
As shown from Figure 7 and Table 7, it is evident that all the correlations among the three main factors: administrative leadership, human resource training and customer satisfaction were statistically significant as their statistical T values were higher than (1.964) and the significance level (probability value) was less than (.05).The values of such correlations among the three factors ranged between (.90) and (.98).Based on the divisions of the proposed research model (administrative leadership, human resource training and customer satisfaction), this required investigating the research hypotheses or the structural research model.

Testing the Structural Modeling of the Research Model: Structural Model
The structural model as shown in Figure 6 differs from the measurement model as shown in Figure 7.In the structural model, the independent and dependent variable as well as medial variable are determined by the unidirectional arrow (→), so the model is completely identical to the proposed study.Regarding the measurement model, the relations among the three factors represent independent relations which are reflected or expressed by the bidirectional arrow (↔), but without determining the independent variable, the dependent www.ccsen variable a structural Table 5  the value of the significance level (.000) is significant statistically less than stake (.05), in addition to the value of the path coefficient or standard estimates equal to (.81) and has a positive direction which emphasizes the increased attention to administrative leadership leads to higher human resource training , the effect size was (.65), that means (65%) of human resources training due to the administrative leadership.This is significant impact the potential variables where it is greater than (25%).

Human Resource Training & Customer Satisfaction
The third hypothesis indicates that there is a positive and direct impact of human resources training on improving customer satisfaction, as in the previous steps to the default theoretical model and outputs of Amos program scheme Table 6, the hypothesis was a statistical significant given that the statistical value of (T) (3.573) was higher than the stake (1.964), and the value of the significance level (.000) is significant statistically less than stake (.05), in addition to the value of the path coefficient or standard estimates equal to (.31) and has a positive direction which emphasizes the increased attention to human resource training leads to higher customer satisfaction, in addition the total effect size on customer satisfaction (.84), this means that (84%) of customer satisfaction due to both the administrative leadership and human resources training.This size is considered due to significant impact on the potential variables.The analysis also indicated in terms of importance of the effect that the effect sixe of administrative leadership was (.65), most important of human resources training, which its effect size was (.31) and the most influential on the high level of customer satisfaction.

The Impact of Administrative Leadership on Customer Satisfaction through Human Resource Training
The fourth research hypothesis confirms that there is an indirect impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction through the mediating factor of human resource training.As seen in Table 9 and Figure 8, the value of the indirect impact or relation is (.25), which was obtained by multiplying the value of the path coefficient or estimates of the relation between administrative leadership and human resource training (.81) by the value of the path coefficient or estimates of the relation between human resource training and customer satisfaction (.31).The overall impact estimated was (.90) which was resulting from the addition of the overall path coefficient or direct impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction (.65) to the overall path coefficient or non-direct impact of the administrative leadership on customer satisfaction (.65 +.25).

Conclusion
The results of statistical analysis using the SEM-AMOS for the proposed research hypotheses indicate that all the factors of the study have positive relations and significant impact on customer satisfaction.Such results corroborate those results obtained in previous studies (Abu Zeid, 2012;Pangil, 2011;Issa, 2014;Al-Otaibi, 2014;Lori, 2011).These results are considered as the main findings through which the researcher achieved the research objectives in this study.The results of the present study imply that in reality, achieving customer satisfaction depends on the patterns of the administrative leadership as well as the power sources for the administrative leadership in the bank.The interesting part of these results is that the results proved that the patterns of the democratic and free leadership had a positive impact on customer satisfaction as opposed to the bureaucratic pattern of leadership that showed a negative impact on customer satisfaction.As far as the power sources of the administrative leadership are concerned, customer satisfaction depends on the experience and the strong personality as well as the bonus as opposed to the structural power that had a negative impact on customer satisfaction.The current study obtained another result showing that human resource training plays an important role as a mediator between (1) the administrative leadership through the democratic and free patterns of leadership as well as the strong personality, experience and reward, and (2) customer satisfaction by developing their knowledge and abilities as well as their attitudes towards the dimensions and criteria used for evaluating the quality of services offered to customers while accessing or obtaining the service.

Table 9 .
The value of the indirect impact