A Study of Hong Kong Tax Compliance Ethics

Daniel Ho, Brossa Wong

Abstract


This paper extends our previous study by discussing in more details the composition and functions of the Board of Review in Hong Kong. We conduct a trend analysis on the Board’s decisions by examining three recent informal tax cases relating to compliance behavior for individual taxpayers in Hong Kong. We find that the more recent Board’s decisions are quite consistent with our previous findings. The level of penalty tax levied increases with the intention of the taxpayers to avoid tax, the magnitude of tax undercharged and the poor attitude of taxpayers. Despite the regular changes in the composition of the Board members, consistency in the Board’s decisions may be explained by the following reasons: there is no change in principle or in spirit in making decisions, there is no new development in the penalty policy and the Board has been adopting the decisions of precedent Board cases in similar situations.


Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v2n4p188

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

International Business Research  ISSN 1913-9004 (Print), ISSN 1913-9012 (Online)

Copyright © Canadian Center of Science and Education

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ccsenet.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.